DISCOMFORT AND INSECURITY AS MODERATORS IN TAM AMONG RURAL WOMEN USERS OF E_BANKING SERVICES

  • Makesh K. G Associate Professor of Commerce, Government Arts and Science College Uduma.
  • Meera Varghese Doctoral Research Scholar in Commerce, Maharaja’s College Ernakulam
Keywords: TAM, Discomfort, Insecurity, Technology Readiness, e_Banking, Women

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the relationship between citizens' readiness in using e_Banking services and intention to use the same. This is an attempt to analyse the moderating role of Technology readiness by the users, in the acceptance of e_Banking services.

Methods: An empirical investigation was conducted among 298 women by employing a survey method. Both offline and online modes were used for data collection.

Findings: Analysis results shows that insecurity in using technology moderates PU-BI and does not moderate PEOU-BI. Likewise, discomfort with technology moderates PEOU-BI and does not moderate PU- BI relationship.

Theoretical implication: The study validates the Existing TAM model and by examining Insecurity and discomfort as moderators, addresses the extant literature that presents fragmented views.

Practical implication: The immediate implications are for the researchers who wish to examine the applicability of Technology readiness constructs in TAM. The study is also useful to the service providers as it gives insights into the importance of addressing the inhibitions to use the technology.

Originality: This study examines the relationship between citizens' readiness and intention. By incorporating the individual traits as moderating variables to the TAM whereas, prior studies have investigated the direct relationship between technology readiness and intention to use the e_banking services.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992). (1992), “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication”, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 227-247. MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227–247.
2.Alwan, H. A., & Al-Zu’bi, A. I. (2016). Determinants of Internet bank- ing adoption among customers of commercial banks: An empiri- cal study in the Jordanian banking sector. 11 (3), 95–104. International Journal of Business Management, 11(3), 95–104.
3.Awamleh, R., & Fernandes, C. (2006). Diffusion of Internet Banking amongst educated consumers in a high-income non-OECD country. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 11(3).
4.Bandura, A. (1982). Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
5.Chang, Y., & Chen, J. (2021). What motivates customers to shop in smart shops? The impacts of smart technology and technology readiness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58(October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102325
6.Chin, W., & Gopal, A. (1995). Adoption Intention in GSS: Relative Importance of Beliefs. 42–63.
7.Cruz-cárdenas, J., Guadalupe-lanas, J., & Ramos-galarza, C. (2021). Drivers of technology readiness and motivations for consumption in explaining the tendency of consumers to use technology-based services. Journal of Business Research, 122(August 2020), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.054
8.Dabholkar, P. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2002). An Attitudinal Model of Technology - Based Self - Servi ce : Moderating Effects of Consumer Traits and Situational Factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 184–201.
9.Daniel, E. (1999). Provision of electronic banking in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
10.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. ,. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
11.Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Model Published by : INFORMS Stable URL : https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151 REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article : You may need to log in to JSTOR to . Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
12.Delafrooz, N., Taleghani, M., Karami, R., & Moradi, A. (2013). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking. International Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, 3(2), 82–100.
13.Edwin, C. T. C., David, Y. C., & Andy, Y. C. L. (2006). Adoption of Inter- net banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1558–1572.
14.Filipiak, U., & Walle, Y. M. (2015). The financial literacy gender gap: A question of nature or nurture? (176; Issue 176).
15.Gefen, D. (2003). TAM or Just Plain Habit: A Look at Experienced Online Shoppers. International Journal of End User Computing, 15(3), 1–13.
16.Guozheng, Z., Faming, Z., Xi-Wang, & Zhang, Y.-. (2008). Research on factors affecting customer’s interactions with online Bank.
17.Hofstede, G. C. (1980). Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Sage, London, 25.
18.Inegbedion, H. E. (2018). Factors that Influence Customers’ Attitude toward Electronic Banking in Nigeria Factors that Influence Customers’ Attitude toward Electronic Banking in Nigeria. Journal of Internet Commerce, 17(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332861.2018.1463482.
Published
2026-06-04
How to Cite
Makesh K. G, & Meera Varghese. (2026). DISCOMFORT AND INSECURITY AS MODERATORS IN TAM AMONG RURAL WOMEN USERS OF E_BANKING SERVICES. IJRDO - Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research, 12(1), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.69980/sshr.v12i1.6734